Gvr4guy wrote on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 09:03 PM

Link to information http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/291.html

Reply To This

Gvr4guy wrote on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 06:53 AM

I'm a kook huh? Wow thank you for your deep & thought provoking analysis. I'm sure to loose sleep now.

You see I was raised with the knowledge that the media will only report things the way they want to. that if you want real answers you sometimes have to dig a bit.

Example; Local KING5 news story a few years ago stating that gunshot wounds to the head were up substantially from the year before, then rambling off about the scourge of gun violence in our area. So I called the hospital in question & while in fact yes gunshot wounds to the head were in fact up 18% from the year before however, both overall gunshot wounds & fatalities where down 5%.

So when I see a politician who's entire career was taking on the banking industry on behalf on the individual investor, A man who had spent a great deal of time rallying other states to strengthen their banking laws in order to protect borrowers, opening investigations into fraud & irresponsible use of public funds to bail out privet banks that made poor financial decisions have his life investigated because a BANKER thought his privet money transfers seemed suspicious, I get a little curious.

When I then find evidence that his investigation & subsequent removal from office was politically motivated, I for one feel it is important to let people know.

what should you know? That a banker using a Claus of the patriot act initiated an investigation of potential bribery, that no evidence of bribery was discovered, that no evidence of association to terrorism was discovered & that his money transfers in & of themselves where not deemed illegal. The investigation should have ended there. It did not. After determining that Mr Spitzer had transferred funds to a company fronting for a prostitution ring they began wire taps using another obscure law from the early 1900's against white slavery.

Read the links below & decide for yourself if the powers that be had any political/financial reasons for going after Mr Spitzer.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/article/cuomo-subprime-investigation-likely_396621_55.html

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a8ry4S5dGsFs&refer=home

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/12/subprime-loan-investigati_n_81224.html

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/statements/global_resolution.html

Now you say I'm a kook well I guess I'm at least in good company.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-g-brant/eliot-spitzer-george-bus_b_91764.html

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/03/hbc-90002589

In my original post I linked to the simplest way to convey my concerns, as most would rather have a short clip than read huge numbers of articles.

A search of "wall street investigations" & "sub-prime crises will yield you much more.

Next time try getting off your lazy ass & looking for the truth before resorting to name calling.

And While Bush may not seem all that bright it would be foolish to discount what he & those in his administration are capable of doing in the interest of their own agenda.

Next up will be the North American Union. News at eleven.

Reply To This

Gvr4guy wrote on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 07:45 AM

One last damming example for those who didn't click on the sub links.

http://www.gregpalast.com/elliot-spitzer-gets-nailed/

Reply To This

Gvr4guy wrote on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 07:24 PM

Ok Robert, do you believe in god? If so where is your proof?

Do you not believe in God,? If not where is your proof?

For many, many years we knew the Sub-Planet Pluto existed even while lacking direct proof.

How? It's effects could bee seen in the orbits of planets near it.

It was no less true that it was there before we could see it than after we could.

BTW the sky is blue due to light refraction of our atmosphere & has nothing to due with light reflecting off the oceans.

I never said bush picked up a phone & said bust this guy. that does not mean I don't feel Bush to lack culpability. he is after all the captain of or ship & bears sole responsibility for the actions of it's crew.

If you want to say (without proof I might add) that he has no involvement in the Justis Dept that answers to the white house or the FBI that also answers to the white house then I would say he is guilty of criminal negligence.

Do you really lack a basic understanding of power structure in our country? To the point of thinking an investigation can be conducted against a Governor w/o white house knowledge?

Anyway I'm done with your circular, ad hominen arguments.

Reply To This